Page 1 of 1

abnormal wheel standard

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2022 2:14 pm
by RayofSunshine
Everyone is more familiar with the normal early "wheel status" of the 0-4-0s, 2-4-0s, etc , but I have run across some interesting alignments in a book titled: "The Illustrated Directly of North American Locomotives". Here are the expansions made for "more power":
Ruben Wells 0-10-0 1868
Central Pacific 4-10-0 1884
B&O Rwy 0-6-6-0 1903
Santa Fe 2-10-2 1903
AT&SF 4-4-6-2 1909 Mallet type
AT&SF 2-10-10-2 1911 3000 Class Mallet type
B&O Rwy 2-6-6-2 1911
Erie Rwy 2-8-8-8-2 1915 the last "8-2" are under the tender
Russian 2-10-10 1918 Decapod Frisco never left the U.S. due Russian Revolution
Virginia Rwy 2-10-10-2 1918 Mallet type
UP Rwy 4-12-2 1926
Canadian 4-4-4 1929
UP Rwy 4-6-6-4 1936 Challenger
UP Rwy 4-8-8-2 1938 Cab Front
UP Rwy 4-8-8-4 1941 big Boy w/ tender 4-4-6

This came from a book on Colorado Railroads: Unitah Rwy 2-6-6-2 for mine deliveries
Source forgotten of: a B&O K1 class 2-6-6-2 1911

I have found that most of these are separately cateloged for further details on stats.

Re: abnormal wheel standard

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2022 2:41 pm
by Gumboots
Yes, people have been quite inventive in the search for more grunt. :) There are even stranger things out there if you look around. Some of the early Baldwins were very odd, and the Europeans got pretty experimental too.

BTW, the Decapod is 2-10-0, not 2-10-10. ;) I think the "Canadian 4-4-4" is referring to the CPR F2a Jubilee, which was a very stylish class IMO.

Re: abnormal wheel standard

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:08 pm
by sbaros
Did the UP possess a 4-8-8-2 "Cab Front" (more correctly "Cab Forward" ? I thought this was an SP exclusivity ...

Re: abnormal wheel standard

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2022 4:45 pm
by Gumboots
Yes, it was. There might be an error in the book that Ray used as a source.