Oops.... Yes you are absolutely right. Multiply by 375.
Regards, Chris
Search found 14 matches
- Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:58 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
- Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:21 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Where do I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4281
- Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:27 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Foreign station congestion trick
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2633
Foreign station congestion trick
Here's a little trick I learned by accident. Perhaps you guys know about it already, but here goes. How often hasn't it happened to you that you need to get into a train station owned by a different company, but it is single track and the other company is running a gazillion trains through there. As...
- Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:15 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Where do I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4281
- Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:59 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Where do I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4281
- Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:47 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Where do I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4281
Where do I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
Sorry if this has been covered before, but where should I report bugs in 106 beta 4?
Regards, Chris
Regards, Chris
- Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:44 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
- Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:24 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
It seems that I have been conservative with #2. That as been partly for purpose, because I want to avoid making super engines. At the same rate I am going to have to de-rate the P-2 a bit. Not a popular move, I suspect but accuracy before all. If memory serves it is a bit stronger than 17 at the mo...
- Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:20 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
Yes, I find it odd that Tractive Effort (TE) doesn't appear to be involved in the numbers of RT3 locomotives. At least I have not yet been able to find where that comes in. I have the formula for Tractive Effort at home. Very interesting. As I understand it the Adhesion Ratio (AR) is Weight on Drive...
- Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:36 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
- Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:40 am
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
There are flaws though in these calculations, something I will have to look into more deeply. For example, formula 1 gtives us cylinder horsepower. Formula 2 takes drawbar horsepower as input. Not the same thing. Also, for some engines I have (historic) numbers for drawbar and cylinder horsepower. D...
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:49 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
- Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:04 pm
- Forum: RT III General Discussion
- Topic: Long time no see
- Replies: 35
- Views: 20938
Long time no see
Hey there folks, long time no see. I do apologize for my "on again, off again" appearance in this forum. Turning to my area of special interest: LCO files. I seem to remember that the elusive "Value 1" and "Value 2" were determined to be "Weight of train that can b...
- Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:13 pm
- Forum: The Conference Table
- Topic: What's your favorite snack while playin' games?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5163