Interesting thread. Thanks for posting that link Wolvy.
As fate would have it, I got the latest Newsletter form Windows Secrets this morning and one of the articles discusses 64 bit apps. and apparently their oddity for the home user, claiming that they're primarily available, at the moment, for the corporate/IT world.
Here's a link to it if you're interested.
http://windowssecrets.com/2010/01/28/01 ... es/#story1
Bottom line: What I come away with is that a 64 bit OS may be beneficial to me but I'm not sure the additional cost would offset the benefits.
I say it might be beneficial to me as I'm currently running a dual monitor setup and I sometimes have 7 or 8 programs loaded at the same time. The biggest memory users I guess would be PSP and 3 different browsers (
one with several tabs opened), along with the programs I use for web design, email, and the stuff running in the background - anti-virus, firewall, Cacheman XP, Display Fusion (
for the dual monitor setup), Weatherbug, and Secunia, plus all the hidden stuff.
BTW! A correction on a previous post of mine where I said 64 bit OS's can use up to 64 GB of RAM. That should read 16 exabytes (
16 billion GB), at least according to the Windows Secrets article.
That is, of course, theoretically. Even Win 7 Ultimate can only use 192 GB RAM.