DSL proprietary modem required

Discussion of any computer-related issues.
Gwizz
CEO
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:45 pm

DSL proprietary modem required Unread post

Well I finally ordered DSL. Found it on sale for just under $62 a month with unlimited long distance, call waiting and MSN as my ISP. Customer service is in india. I will miss the service I got from Icehouse.

Found out the DSL wireless Modem is sold only by the phone company. ($99.00)

I was told there is a house bill in the making requiring the phone company to give out the code to break their DSL Modem monoply. I hope it passes.

What is required when changing from the phone line to a DSL line?
User avatar
Hawk
The Big Dawg
Posts: 6503
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:28 am
Location: North Georgia - USA

Unread post

DSL runs on your existing phone line, as long as you're close enough to the cabinet, which your phone company will know if you are or not.
Hawk
milo
Engineer
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:36 pm
Location: End of the line

Unread post

In fact, they may not know... There's a salesguy from AT&T who's frantically trying to get me to go DSL again, and doesn't seem to accept that the phone lines in this building were installed in the '50s by someone who thought wrapping the wires around eyebolts every yard or so was pretty. Doesn't matter that I can SEE the darn central office from here - they've tried, and the best rate they can provide is something like 160-192Kbps - but this doof is convinced he can get me rates faster than cable. For some reason he won't put money on it, though. :wink:
User avatar
Hawk
The Big Dawg
Posts: 6503
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:28 am
Location: North Georgia - USA

Unread post

Well, he is a salesman for AT&T. That's two strikes against him right off the bat. :lol:
Hawk
User avatar
canis39
Brakeman
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Unread post

I had DSL through Verizon for a while...it was pretty mediocre. The speed was acceptable, but the connectivity was unreliable.

I switched to Fiberoptic a few months back and couldn't be happier. Same price, MUCH faster, and very reliable.

I really wouldn't recommend DSL unless it's the only broadband option you have.
User avatar
Hawk
The Big Dawg
Posts: 6503
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:28 am
Location: North Georgia - USA

Unread post

Cable Modem is generally about 10 times faster than DSL, on download anyway. For upload speeds, DSL is faster.
DSL upload and download speeds are the same but with cable modem the upload speeds are about 10 to 15 times slower than download speeds, depending on your cable company and their connection allow-ability.
For instance, my cable connection gives me about 8000 KB download but only about 357 KB upload.
Cable is also affected by line usage. The more folks that have their TV on and/or are using the internet, the slower your connection.
DSL is supposed to be unaffected by usage.
Hawk
Gwizz
CEO
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:45 pm

Unread post

Thanks all Still learning

I contacted the phone companies Cust. Support (India) The Third fellow seemed to know his stuff. He said they preferred to sell me the phone companys Modem.
I asked why I can't just connect the DSL line to my Router and the router to my NIC port. He said it would probably work if I used cat5. But they might have to send me drivers that matched my modems.

Well heck, I will just have to wait to find out for my self what will work.

Question: For a wireless modem, doesn't each extra computer I add to the system need something to read the wireless signal.
The first India tech said NO.
davey917
Hobo
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:24 pm
Location: Blair, Nebraska

Unread post

Gwizz, not really.
If you're connectiong multiple computers to your DSL, the proper line-up is : phone line (DSL) -> Modem -> router =>>computer(s).
This setup will allow all computers access to the net (and each other) at the same time. The only glitch might be your OS. Windows needs (i think) Win98 or higher to talk to each other.

Now, there are also wireless routers available which would require additional hardware at each computer.

BE AWARE: if you use both a wireless modem and wireless routers, be sure they use different frequencies/encoding.
Gwizz
CEO
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:45 pm

Unread post

Thanks Davey

That what I thought.

Some of the techs in India are a bit hard to understand.
But I'm changing my mind and now I think I will hard wire the DSL.

One last question. They are offering me a 1.5 MB or I can get a 7.0 MB DSL line for a little more each month.

Will 1.5 be enough to watch online TV or movies?
User avatar
Hawk
The Big Dawg
Posts: 6503
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:28 am
Location: North Georgia - USA

Unread post

7 MB DSL? I didn't know any phone company offered DSL that fast.
If it's just a little more each month, that would be my option. Then you wouldn't have to worry about whether or not it will handle movies.
It will. :-)
Hawk
User avatar
canis39
Brakeman
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Unread post

My fiberoptic connection is 5 MB down and 2 MB up. The 5 MB down has been plenty fast enough for everything I've thrown at it so far, so I would think 7 MB would be great, depending on the price.
Gwizz
CEO
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:45 pm

Unread post

Well the tech in India said I could have 7.0 Mb but the locals say not yet. The line is not ready. I have a major software company service tech next door who works out of his home. There is a healthy looking blue box in our common right-of-way. He has been updating his equipment lately. I wonder how close that connection really is?????? :D
User avatar
Hawk
The Big Dawg
Posts: 6503
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:28 am
Location: North Georgia - USA

Unread post

Might not hurt to be a bit neighborly with him. :wink:
Hawk
Gwizz
CEO
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:45 pm

Unread post

!*th_up*!
User avatar
Braindead6
Brakeman
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:45 pm
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee (within spittin' distance of Kentucky)

Unread post

I'm one of those people that can't get cable or a conventional DSL. I went with Starband. You don't need a phone line because you download and upload through it's own satellite dish. It's not for the faint at heart to pay for the set-up, but when your only other choice is dial-up it was worth it.
The only problem I had when I first started was that they would not support networking, and the software took up it's share of ram.
I just upgraded my modem and now I don't have any software installed, although I do have to have a network card (which I had by the way).
The modem also supports networking, which is a big plus.
Although it doesn't compare to cable, I still get 512Kbps download and 128Kbps upload speeds.
Maybe one day they'll run cable by here.

Jim
I never worry about what other people do. I have enough trouble remembering what I already did
Post Reply